hearT DISEASE AND STROKE IN RURAL AMERICA: A Literature review

by Miguel Zuniga, D’Arcie Anderson, and Kristie Alexander

 

 

SCOPE OF PROBLEM

 

  • Disease of the heart is the first ranking among the leading causes of death in 1999.29
  • Stroke is the third ranking leading cause of death in 1999.29
  • Heart diseases are the most frequently first-listed diagnoses for hospital discharges nationally.26
  • Heart failure and stroke is the most frequent diagnostic category among hospitalized rural elderly Medicare beneficiaries.27
  • Congestive heart failure, hypertension, and angina are “ambulatory-care-sensitive” conditions.28
  • Pacemaker insertion, coronary artery bypass surgery, and coronary angioplasty are “referral-sensitive” conditions.28

 

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

 

Approximately 61 million individuals in the United States are afflicted with some form of cardiovascular disease, which includes both heart disease and stroke and contributes to an estimated four of every 10 deaths in the United States.8 Compounding the problem is the staggering percentage of the population with high cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity¾all risk factors for heart disease and stroke.30 While there has been a 50 percent reduction in coronary heart disease and stroke in the past 30 years,3 mostly attributable to advances in therapy and technology, disparities among certain subgroups have become more exaggerated.4 Among these vulnerable subgroups include rural populations,5, 6 particularly those in the South and Appalachian region.4

 

Given that heart disease and stroke are the first and third leading causes of death in the United States,1 addressing this health concern is pivotal to improving the nation’s health. Specifically, the goal of the Healthy People 2010 heart disease and stroke objective is to “improve cardiovascular health and quality of life through the prevention, detection, and treatment of risk factors; early identification and treatment of heart attacks and strokes; and prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events.”2

 

The Healthy People 20102 objectives addressed in this section are as follows:

 

  • 12-1. Reduce coronary heart disease deaths.
  • 12-3. Increase artery-opening therapy.
  • 12-7. Reduce stroke deaths.
  • 12-9. Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure.
  • 12-12. Increase blood pressure monitoring.
  • 12-15. Increase blood cholesterol screening.

 

The following definitions are pertinent to the discussion of heart disease and stroke:

 

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD), as defined in HP2010, “includes a variety of diseases of the heart and blood vessels, coronary heart disease (coronary artery disease, ischemic heart disease), stroke (brain attack), high blood pressure (hypertension), rheumatic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and peripheral artery disease.”2

- Coronary heart disease (CHD) occurs when there is a decreased flow of blood to the heart muscle, resulting in damage and/or death of the deoxygenated heart muscle.2

 - Acute myocardial infarction (AMI, commonly called a “heart attack”) “occurs when a coronary artery becomes completely blocked, usually by a blood clot (thrombus), resulting in lack of blood flow to the heart muscle and therefore loss of needed oxygen.”2

  • Cerebrovascular disease “affects the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain.”2

- Stroke occurs when the brain does not receive an adequate supply of blood due to the rupture of blood vessels or the presence of blood clots.2 There are two main types of strokes: ischemic (blockage) and hemorrhagic (bleeding). Ischemic strokes are the most common, and account for approximately 88 percent of all strokes.31

  • Antithrombolytic therapy utilizes intravenous medications that dissolve blood clots, possibly reducing damage to the heart and brain during an acute myocardial infarction or a stroke.32
  • ACE inhibitors are medications that enable the lowering of blood pressure by promoting the expansion of blood vessels (vasodilation).33
  • Statins are a family of medications proven effective in lowering serum cholesterol and blood lipid levels. Statins have been shown to reduce the long-term risk of AMIs and strokes.34
  • Advanced Cardiac Life Support training (ACLS training) heightens health care providers’ awareness of current developments in the treatment procedures of cardiopulmonary emergencies.35
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG surgery) increases blood flow from the heart by bypassing the clogged portion of the coronary artery through a surgically implanted vein or artery taken from a different portion of the body.36

 

identified by people living in rural areas as a high priority health issue for them

 

According to the Rural Healthy People 2010 survey, heart disease and stroke ranked second across the four groups of state and local respondents in the frequency of priority nominations received. This focus area was nominated by an average of 41 percent of the respondents.7 Respondents from rural hospitals and rural health centers and clinics were more likely than respondents from local public health offices or state health organizations to rate this topic area as a high priority. State agency respondents were least likely to rate heart disease and stroke as a priority. The differences in nomination rates were statistically significant. The Midwest and South regions were more likely than the Northeast or West to nominate heart disease and stroke as a rural priority area. The difference across the regions was statistically significant.37

 

PREVALENCE AND DISPARITIES IN RURAL AREAS

 

Heart disease and stroke are respectively the first and third leading causes of death in the United States1 and cost the United States almost $298 billion annually.8 In 1999, cardiovascular disease contributed to one out of every 2.5 deaths, (958,775 individuals).30 Stroke affects more than 600,000 individuals every year. The associated cost for treatment and rehabilitative services for stroke victims in the United States is an estimated $41 billion annually.38

 

Although heart disease is sometimes considered a disease mostly affecting men, half of all cardiovascular disease deaths occur in women.8 Women are almost twice as likely to die from heart disease than to die from cancer.39 According to the Center for Disease Control and Preventions’ National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-94), during early adulthood, men have higher rates of cardiovascular disease than women, but this difference lessens during later years—equaling each other at the ages of 65-74 and surpassing men at the age of 75 years.30 The highest rates of heart disease deaths among women occur in Northeastern large urban areas followed by the South’s most rural counties.9 For men, the highest heart disease-related deaths occur in the South’s most rural counties.9 For women and men, the lowest death rates from heart disease occur in the West.9

 

As noted earlier, the incidence of heart disease and stroke has declined significantly over the past three decades;3 however, the decline has not been uniform across all subgroups. According to 1995 data, the death rate for African-American males from cardiovascular disease is 42 percent higher than white males, and the rate for African-American females is 65 percent higher than white females.2 Other vulnerable populations to heart disease and stroke include older African Americans,2 Hispanic Americans,3 individuals of lower socioeconomic status,11 and as noted in the preceding, rural populations,5, 6 particularly those in the South and Appalachian region.4, 12 This trend, as summarized by Wing,11 suggests that coronary heart disease has shifted from a disease of the privileged to one of the disadvantaged.

 

According to self-reported data in the 1996 National Health Interview Survey, heart disease was 1.34 times more prevalent in non-metropolitan statistical areas (non-MSAs) (98.8 per 1,000 individuals) when compared to metropolitan statistical areas (72.6 per 1,000 individuals). Cerebrovascular disease was reportedly 1.45 times higher in non-MSAs than in MSAs (15.1 per 1,000 individuals and 10.4 per 1,000 individuals, respectively). Hypertension was also higher in rural than urban areas (101.3 per 1,000 individuals in MSAs and 128.8 per 1,000 individuals in non-MSAs).13 Ischemic heart disease, which contributed to over 60 percent of heart disease mortalities in 1998,40 is nationally higher in rural counties among men 20 years of age and older.9

 

True prevalence data for heart disease and stroke in rural versus urban areas are not readily available. However, differences in mortality data often reflect disparities between rural and urban areas. From 1985-1995, declines in mortality rates for premature coronary heart disease in African Americans and whites were found to be slower in the rural South than their counterparts in other geographic areas. For African-American women and men, the slowest rates of annual decline were in the rural South, with rates of 1.6 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively. The fastest areas for decline of coronary heart disease mortality among African Americans were in less metropolitan areas (counties with fewer than one million people) outside the South, which had declines measuring 3.3 percent for African-American women and 3.9 percent for African-American men.12

 

IMPACT OF THE CONDITION ON MORTALITY

 

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States. In 1999, there were 725,192 heart disease deaths and 167,366 stroke deaths. The age-adjusted death rate for heart disease was 265.9 deaths per 100,000, and for stroke was 61.4 deaths per 100,000.14

 

In recent years there have been numerous medical advances both in therapy and in technology of CVD. Improvements in medicine and Medicare coverage of expensive procedures have contributed to decreased mortality overall. From 1986 to 1998, mortality following an AMI admission declined by one-third—from 24 percent to 16 percent.41 Nonetheless, disparities of benefits in medical advances in rural areas when compared to urban areas sometimes result in increased mortality.

 

IMPACT OF THE CONDITION ON MORBIDITY

 

Heart disease and stroke are leading causes of disability, annually costing the United States an estimated $19 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively.15 Compared to population norms, quality of life domains represented by physical function, role physical, role emotional, vitality, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, and general health are lower for people living with coronary heart disease and stroke as compared to population norms.42, 43

 

In 1999, the most common diagnosis for individuals 65 years of age and older was heart disease¾comprising 23 percent (4.5 million) of total inpatient discharges, with an average stay of 4.7 days.26 In recent years, more people have received cardiac procedures. From 1986 to 1998, angioplasty increased from 1.3 to 8.4 individuals per 1,000, and CABGs increased from 2.7 to 4.8 individuals per 1,000.41

 

CONTRIBUTOR TO MANY OTHER HEALTH PROBLEMS

 

With heart disease and stroke, there is increased likelihood of recurrence and other macrovascular complications.16 There are a significant number (1 in 40) of AMI patients who suffer from an ischemic stroke within six months of discharge.16 Individuals over 65, females, blacks, those with frailties, and those with prior medical history of stroke are at increased risk of stroke occurrence after an AMI.16

 

Depression is significantly associated with both heart disease17 and stroke.18, 19 Some studies suggest a causal relationship between depression and AMI and stroke,19 while others report the evidence of depression after other debilitating events44 and intensive medical treatments, such as CABG surgery.45 Morris18 reported in a 10-year follow-up study that individuals diagnosed with depression after suffering a stroke had a mortality rate three times higher than those not diagnosed with depression. In an analysis of several studies, Glassman17 found a strong association between depression and heightened occurrence of and mortality from cardiovascular disease.

 

BARRIERS

 

Rural populations have certain behaviors and attitudes that contribute to their heightened risks of coronary heart disease and stroke. Rate of lifestyle change, individuals’ perception of heart disease risk, and attitudes of health care providers may heighten the disparity in heart disease and stroke incidence in rural versus urban areas.

 

Pearson5 proposes that rural areas do not adopt changes in behaviors as rapidly as do urban areas. Historically, rural areas have not adopted behaviors such as smoking, high-fat diets, and sedentary lifestyles as readily as urban areas. Similarly, once these coronary heart disease and stroke risk factors are adopted in the rural areas, they are reversed at a slower rate than urban areas. In one study of ischemic heart disease patients in rural West Virginia, 27 percent continued smoking after diagnosis.46 This delay in lifestyle changes partially explains the initial lower rate of coronary heart disease in rural areas compared to urban areas, and the gradual evolution to higher rates of coronary heart disease in rural areas.5

 

Another possible contributor to the higher rates of coronary heart disease in rural areas is that of socioeconomic status. Lower standards of living and social and economic restrictions, rampant in some rural areas, lead to higher prevalence of coronary heart disease risk factors, such as cigarette smoking, poor dietary habits, and sedentary lifestyles.47

 

Perception of risk may also play a role in the rural/urban disparity for heart disease. Some rural inhabitants do not perceive themselves at risk for heart disease and stroke, and their behaviors are modeled by these misperceptions. Older rural women reportedly have a decreased perception of heart disease and are less likely to participate in primary prevention efforts, such as screening procedures. This lower perceived risk is exacerbated by the decreased availability of screenings in rural areas.20

 

Attitudes of health care providers toward patients in rural settings can determine the quality of medical care. In a scenario-survey sent to a random selection of family physicians, heart patients with reduced access to services were not as likely to be referred to a cardiologist or to receive a left ventricular function test¾two heart failure guidelines. Physicians’ treatment methods were affected by the patient’s environment.48

 

Beyond social and behavioral barriers, rural residents are faced with access challenges and service gaps in seeking treatment and prevention services. The unique challenges faced by rural residents include the prolonged distance to provision of comprehensive post-discharge care of heart failure21 and limited access to personnel, screening services (e.g., cholesterol checks), and treatment services for heart disease and stroke. When screening does occur, dietary assessments and other needed follow-up measures are often unavailable.49 Furthermore, organizations disseminating heart disease and stroke prevention strategies may have only limited activities in rural areas.5

 

Procedures in the treatment of heart disease and stroke are also more limited in rural areas than in urban areas. Availability of technology is a main factor for geographic differences in testing patients for stroke diagnosis.50 Some physicians in rural areas are averse to treating stroke patients with anticoagulant therapy because of limited experience in administration and monitoring of the drug and fear of drug complications, such as excessive bleeding and/or fatal bleeding.38 A study of Medicare patients in one state yielded an antithrombolytic therapy utilization rate 1.7 times greater in urban hospitals than in rural hospitals and demonstrated that patients who were prescribed antithrombolytic therapy were less likely to suffer adverse outcomes.22

 

The relationship between volume and outcome has been the subject of numerous studies. According to a meta-analysis study, the relationship between AMI outcome/stroke outcome and volume is somewhat controversial.51 Thiemann52 reported that high mortality rates of elde