INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION IN RURAL AREAS

by Graciela Castillo and James Alexander 

SCOPE OF PROBLEM

 

· Age-adjusted injury and unintentional injury death rates are higher in rural areas than urban areas.1, 2

· Unintentional injuries are the fifth leading cause of death and are more prevalent in rural areas.3

· Motor vehicle deaths and occupational injuries are higher in rural areas.2

· The 40 percent of agricultural work-related fatalities accounted for by minors far outweighs the small percentage of minors in agriculture, 8 percent.4, 5

 

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

 

The Healthy People 2010 (HP2010) goal for this focus area is to “reduce injuries, disabilities, and deaths due to unintentional injuries.”6 For the purposes of this review, the following Healthy People 2010 objectives are addressed:6

 

· 15.1. Reduce hospitalization for nonfatal head injuries.

· 15.3. Reduce firearm-related deaths.

· 15.4. Reduce the proportion of persons living in homes with firearms that are loaded and unlocked.

· 15.5. Reduce nonfatal firearm-related injuries.

· 15.7. Reduce nonfatal poisonings.

· 15.8. Reduce deaths caused by poisonings.

· 15.13. Reduce deaths from unintentional injuries.

· 15.14. Reduce nonfatal unintentional injuries.

· 15.15. Reduce deaths caused by motor vehicle crashes.

· 15.17. Reduce nonfatal injuries from motor vehicle crashes.

· 15.19. Increase use of safety belts.

· 15.27. Reduce deaths from falls.

· 15.29. Reduce drownings.

· 15.32. Reduce homicides.

· 15.33. Reduce maltreatment and maltreatment fatalities of children.

· 15.34. Reduce the rate of physical assault by intimate partners.

· 15.36. Reduce sexual assaults.

· 15.38. Reduce physical fighting among adolescents.

·  20.1. Reduce work-related injury deaths.

· 20.2. Reduce work-related injuries.

 

Unintentional injuries were the fifth leading cause of death overall in 2001.3 While injury and violence are prevalent in both rural and urban areas, differences exist across urbanicity in the cause and type of injury. The prevalence of high-risk occupations, such as those agriculturally related, and greater travel distances place rural residents at heightened risk for occupational and motor vehicle injuries. The need to address injury and violence in this population is evidenced through the Rural Healthy People 2010 survey in which accidental injury and violence was tied for 13th rank with immunization and infectious diseases as a rural health priority by state and local rural health leaders in considering the 28 Healthy People 2010 focus areas.7 There were no significant differences in rates of nomination across the four geographic regions of the country.

 

PREVALENCE

 

In this review, injuries are classified as intentional or unintentional¾a categorization scheme used by the World Health Organization’s 2002 World Report on Violence and Health.8 In this context, unintentional injury includes injuries related to traffic (motor vehicle, safety belt use, and all-terrain vehicles), occupational and work related (focusing on agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing), firearms, drowning, falls, burns, and poisonings. Intentional injury includes interpersonal violence (pertaining to youth, family, and intimate violence) and homicide.

 

Unintentional Injuries

 

Traffic Injuries

 

Deaths due to motor vehicle-related injuries are a leading cause of unintentional injuries. Higher motor vehicle death rates are found in rural areas than in urban areas, particularly in the West and South.2, 9 An analysis of data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) and the U.S. Census Bureau between 1977-1996 found the rural motor vehicle crash death rate (58.1 percent) was higher than the urban rate (41.9 percent).9 Failure to use safety belts is an important factor in unintentional injuries and deaths.10 Farm residents are less (or have been found to be less) likely to regularly wear safety belts than residents in metropolitan areas.11 Another contributor to traffic injuries and deaths is use of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). Rural residents, farmers, and men have been found more likely to have ridden an ATV in the last year than urban residents.1, 11 While ATVs can be used on farms for work-related activities, they are commonly used for recreation, where more injuries occur.12 Children less than 16 years of age account for approximately 36 percent of ATV-related deaths in the United States.13, 14

 

Occupational Injuries

 

The overall 2001 U.S. occupational fatality rate is 4.3 per 100,000 (after excluding the September 11, 2001 fatalities).15 The highest occupational fatality rates occur among workers in the mining, agriculture, forestry, and fishing industries.2, 16-20 Workers in these sectors also have the highest rates of machine-related deaths and motor vehicle deaths.19

 

In 2000, agriculture, forestry, and fishing had an incidence rate of 6.8 per 100 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses, for a total of 103,400.21, 22 Sprains and strains were the leading injuries and accounted for over 33 percent of injuries in agriculture, forestry, and fishing.23 A review of a rural emergency department found that agricultural work-related injuries accounted for as many as 12.5 percent of 12,000 injuries. Occupational injuries were found more likely to occur among older people and men.17 Farmers, with a mean age of 54, are at heightened risk of occupational nonfatal and fatal injury.24-25 One study found farmers over 55 years of age had an injury rate of 9 per 100 farmers.26 Occupational injury death rates in agriculture are largely due to motor vehicle incidents including tractors and collisions, as well other farm machinery accidents.27 Pesticides and herbicide exposure represent another occupational hazard.

 

The impact of work-related unintentional injuries in agriculture among youth is significant because youth working in agriculture account for 8 percent of the population, but they account for 40 percent of work-related fatalities among minors.4, 5 The rate of work-related agricultural fatalities for youth ages 15-19 is 12.2 per 100,000 FTE, with higher rates among males than females.28-30 The highest rates per 100,000 of fatal injury to children occur in crop production in the Midwest, South, and West.28, 29 In the Northeast, the highest rates of fatalities occur in livestock production.28, 29 The main causes of injury to youth on farms are falls, transportation-related incidents, and “being struck by objects.”31-33 The leading causes of death are machinery accidents and electrical current.5

 

Injuries Due to Firearms

 

Firearm-related injuries contribute to both unintentional and intentional injuries. In 1999, the overall age-adjusted death rate for firearm injuries was 10.6 per 100,000, with the largest rate (21.6 per 100,000) among ages 20-24.34 Urban rates of unintentional firearm injuries were found to be 10 times higher than nonurban (28.3 per 100,000 versus 2.4 per 100,000). In rural counties, nonfatal firearm injuries occurred most often at home compared to urban counties where injuries occurred most often in the streets.35, 36 The unintentional firearm mortality rate is higher (1.0 per 100,000) in nonmetropolitan counties than metropolitan counties (0.5 per 100,000).2, 37

 

Drowning

 

An average of 32 childhood farm drownings occur annually, a rate comparable to that of urban areas.38 Fatalities were most common in the South and Midwest, with the West and Northeast having the lowest rates. From 1986-1997, six states accounted for 45 percent of drowning incidences: Texas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Georgia, and North Carolina.38 Approximately a third of deaths were among children between zero to four years old, and 87 percent of deaths were among boys, making the rate of death 3.8 times higher for boys than for girls.5, 38, 39 Adolescents have also been identified as at risk for drowning.40, 41 

 

Falls, Burns, and Poisonings

Falls, burns, and poisonings are also significant causes of unintentional injuries. In 1995, poisonings were the third leading cause of injury deaths, accounting for 11 percent of injury deaths. In 1995, unintentional poisoning deaths had an age-adjusted death rate in metropolitan counties higher than nonmetropolitan counties, 3.5 compared with 2.0 per each 100,000.2 Certain rural groups may be more vulnerable to poisonings, such as farm workers who are exposed to pesticides and other chemicals.42 Falls were the fourth leading cause of injury death in 1995, and 93 percent of such deaths were due to unintentional injuries.2 Falls from farm vehicles were a significant source of fatalities involving farm vehicles.27 Age is also a strong factor in the occurrence of falls from injuries, particularly among the rural elderly and very young children.43-45 Deaths due to burns were the seventh leading cause of injury deaths in 1995, and the majority (89 percent) were unintentional injuries. Children in metropolitan counties had a slightly higher burn injury rate (363 per 100,000) than nonmetropolitan (296 per 100,000).46

 

Intentional Injuries

 

Interpersonal Injuries

 

Violence among youth is a leading cause of intentional injuries, and data suggest an increasing trend in this category of injuries. The National Youth Gang Center estimates more than 24,500 gangs were active in more than 3,330 jurisdictions across the United States in 2000.47 Thirteen percent of smaller cities reported persistent gang activity compared to only 7 percent of rural counties¾a strong contrast to 100 percent of law enforcement agencies in larger cities reporting such gang activity.48 

Family and intimate partner violence, including domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, and elder abuse, is a problem in urban and rural areas.49 In rural areas, victims of domestic violence were “more likely to report they knew the perpetrator,”50, 51 were older (mid-40s versus mid-30s), twice as likely to be currently involved in an abusive relationship (25 percent versus 12 percent),52 and more likely than urban victims to seek help from clergy.49 There are conflicting data about the differences in domestic abuse among adults in rural and urban areas, ranging from no difference to significantly higher rates in urban areas.49 The rate of child abuse was higher in rural areas, although the difference did not remain when variables such as race and family income were held constant.53 Finally, rural-urban comparisons of prevalence of elderly abuse are difficult given the dearth of comparative information on this subject. Nonetheless, it is important to pay attention to this issue given the increasing and disproportionate numbers of elderly people residing in rural areas. One out of four older Americans live in rural areas, making up 15 percent of the total rural population compared to 11 percent of metropolitan areas.51, 54

Homicide

 

In 1999, the homicide death rate was significantly higher for ages 15-24 (13.2 per 100,000) than among other age groups.34 National data show that across all categories, increasing urbanization is strongly associated with higher homicide rates.20, 55 Rural homicides are more likely to involve firearms than urban homicides.56-58 In 2000, homicide was the leading cause of death for young African-American males and the second leading cause of death for young Hispanic males.15, 20, 59, 60 The disproportionate numbers of homicides among young African-American and Hispanic males is also apparent in rural areas.61 

 

IMPACT

 

In 2001, unintentional injuries were among the fifth leading cause of death overall and the leading cause of death for people ages one to four and 25-34.62-63 Deaths due to motor vehicles are a leading cause of unintentional injuries, and the motor vehicle death rate is higher in rural areas than urban areas. The agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing industries have among the highest occupational fatality rates.2, 17, 18, 23 In addition to deaths among adults, youth also experience occupation fatalities, especially in agriculture. Youth account for 40 percent of work-related fatalities in agriculture.4 For youth and adults, the unintentional firearm fatality rate is higher in nonmetropolitan counties than metropolitan counties.37 Unintentional drowning-related fatalities were found to be most common in the South and Midwest.38 Intentional injuries due to homicide show the South has the highest homicide rates; areas in the Northeast and Midwest have greater urban-rural disparities in homicide rates.20 

 

The majority of data related to injury morbidity is limited to a few areas of unintentional and intentional injuries, such as occupational injuries¾specifically, agriculture and family violence. Falls from vehicles, falls among the elderly, as well as poisonings from pesticide use were also found to be significant contributors to morbidity.27, 42, 64 Falls, burns, and poisonings were also significant causes of unintentional injuries.42, 43, 65, 66 In addition, firearm-related injuries among children in rural areas may be increasing.67, 68

 

Unintentional injuries involving family and intimate partner violence show a link between injuries and related illnesses such substance abuse and mental illnesses.69-74 There are also negative consequences for children who witness domestic violence, including psychological problems, behavioral problems, cognitive difficulties, mental health problems, substance abuse, post traumatic stress disorder, and other trauma-related symptoms.75-79 

 

BARRIERS

 

Unintentional injuries due to motor vehicles in rural areas were found to be affected by factors such as time of driving (dusk, dawn, night), by delayed reporting and discovery of accidents, the fact that rural areas are less likely to have trauma systems or trauma centers, and they are less likely to have health professionals experienced in major trauma.9, 10, 80, 81

 

Social isolation is also a barrier for rural residents seeking services, particularly for the elderly and for victims of domestic abuse. Cultural factors may also impact treatment-seeking behaviors; for example, rural women may be more likely to seek help from clergy than counselors about domestic violence. Barriers within organizations may also exist. For example, a study showed a majority of domestic abuse victims would like to approach the issue with their physicians; yet another study showed that 42 percent of internal medicine residents felt unprepared to deal with domestic violence issues.82

 

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS

 

A critical step toward decreasing the incidence of injury and violence-related mortality and morbidity is the improvement and coordination of surveillance activities. Currently, data on injury are mainly collected at the national level and not the state or local levels.83 The surveillance systems at the state level that do exist vary and are not uniform.19 In addition to surveillance, the populations of interest need to be well defined and classified.

 

Education campaigns in rural areas can be effective in addressing domestic violence and child abuse.84 Violent behavior prevention programs targeting boys and girls at very young ages have also been shown to be effective in decreasing violence behavior during the later teen years.60 In areas of injury and violence where surveillance data as well as effectiveness studies are scarce, particularly along a rural and urban division such as elderly abuse, public education and awareness raising may be a critical first step. Such programs could focus on educating the public at large about the abuse, how to identify it, and where to seek help.85 This could help alleviate the problem of underreporting, which is caused by several factors including denial, embarrassment, a victim’s cognitive or physical inability to seek help, as well as ageism.86, 87 Primary care providers may be best suited to identify and report victims of elder abuse since such patients use health care services more often, and that may be their only social contact.88 

 

Finally, it is important to note that regardless of the injury and violence area being assessed, rural regions vary in the causes and prevalence of injury and violence morbidity and mortality.10, 89 Programs and policies should match local characteristics as closely as possible; one solution will not work for all rural areas.

 

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

 

Overall, age-adjusted injury and unintentional injury death rates are higher in rural areas than urban areas.1, 2 Rural disparities in injury and violence appear to be more prevalent among unintentional rather than intentional injuries. Mortality rates are higher in rural areas in accidents involving motor vehicles, safety belt use, and all-terrain vehicles. The same is also true in occupational injuries, especially since mining, agriculture, forestry, and fishing have the highest fatality rates of all industries. Unintentional firearm fatality rates are also higher in rural areas, although intentional firearm fatality rates (for example, in homicides) are higher in urban areas. The remaining unintentional injuries either had similar prevalence rates in both urban and rural areas, had higher rates in urban areas, or data were insufficient to suggest a difference. This includes unintentional injuries caused by drowning, falls, burns, and poisonings. Intentional injuries are not significantly more prevalent among rural populations. Youth violence and homicide are more common in urban areas, while family and intimate partner violence occurs in similar rates in urban and rural areas. Family and intimate partner abuse victims face additional barriers in seeking services in rural areas. In addition to disparities in prevalence, disparities exist in risk factors between urban and rural areas. Although age, for example, is related to incidence of injury in most settings, age may present additional risks for injury among rural residents engaged in high-risk occupations, e.g., aging farmers. Rural geographic isolation affects the provision and seeking of services, for example, by affecting the availability of experienced health professionals and availability of educational, preventive and treatment programs, and facilities. Social isolation is also a barrier for rural residents, particularly for the elderly and for victims of domestic abuse.

 

It is important to understand the disparities in prevalence and risk factors among rural populations and to incorporate explanatory factors for such disparities in the development, implementation, and evaluation of programs and policies aimed at injury and violence prevention. Urban programs may not be effective in rural areas, and programs effective in one rural area may not be effective in another rural area. Improved surveillance of morbidity and mortality data, a clearer definition of populations studied, and more evaluation of program effectiveness are essential to meet the Healthy People 2010 goals for injury and violence reduction among rural populations.

 

MODELS FOR PRACTICE

 

The following models for practice are examples of programs utilized to address this rural health issue.

 

REFERENCES

 

1. Zwerling, C.; Merchant, J.A.; Nordstrom, D.L.; et al. Risk factors for injury in rural Iowa: Round one of the Keokuk County Rural Health Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20(3):230-233, 2001.

2. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 1996-1997 and Injury Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD, 1997.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics Reports: Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001 51(5), 2003.

4. Perry, M. Children’s agricultural health: Trauma injuries and hazardous inorganic exposures. Journal of Rural Health 19(3):269-278, 2003.

5. Myers, J., and Adekoya, N. Fatal on-farm injuries among youth 16-19 years of age: 1982-1994. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 7(2):101-112, 2001.

6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 Leading Health Indicators. <http://www.healthypeople.gov/LHI/>2002.

7. Gamm, L.; Hutchison, L.; and Bellamy, G. Rural healthy people 2010: Identifying rural health priorities and models for practice. Journal of Rural Health 18(1):9-14, 2002.

8. World Health Organization, World report on violence and health: Summary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1-34, 2002.

9. Brown, L.H.; Khanna A.; and Hunt, R.C. Rural versus urban motor vehicle crash death rates: 20 years of FARS data. Prehospital Emergency Care 4(1):7-13, 2000.

10. Muelleman, R.L., and Mueller, K. Fatal motor vehicle crashes: Variations of crash characteristics within rural regions of different population densities. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 41(2):315-320, 1996.

11. Merchant, J.A.; Stromquest, A.M.; Kelly, K.M.; et al. Chronic disease and injury in an agricultural county: The Keokuk County Rural Health Cohort Study. Journal of Rural Health 18(4):521-535, 2002.

12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention. All-terrain vehicle injury prevention: Two-, three-, and four-wheeled unlicensed motor vehicles (RE9855), Pediatrics 105:1352-1354, 2000.

13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, All-terrain vehicle-related deaths¾West Virginia, 1985-1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48(1):1-4, 1999.

14. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, All-terrain vehicle exposure, injury, death, and risk studies. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1998.

15. National Center for Health Statistics, Health, United States, 2003. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003.

16. Marsh, S.M., and Layne, L.A. Fatal injuries to civilian workers in the United States, 1980-1995. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Publication Number 2001-129, 2001.

17. Geyman, J.; Norris, T.; and Hart, L. Chapter 2: The Rural Patient. In: Textbook of Rural Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001, 23-26.

18. Loomis, D.; Richardson, D.B.; Wolf, S.H.; et al. Fatal occupational injuries in a southern state. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(12):1089-1099, 1997.

19. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Worker Health Chartbook, 2000. Cinncinati, Ohio. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2000-127, 2000.

20. Eberhardt, M; Ingram, D.; Makuc, D.; et al. Urban and Rural Health Chartbook, Health, United States, 2001. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001.

21. United States Department of Labor. Workplace injuries and illnesses in 2000. Washington D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2001.

22. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Mining Facts 2001. Publication Number 2003-105, 2003.

23. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Lost-work-time injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting time away from work, 2000. USDL 02-196. Washington D.C., 2002.

24. Donham, K.J.; Osterberg, D.; Myers, M.; et al. Tractor risk abatement and control: The policy conference. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa, September 10-12, 1997.

25. Rautiainen, R.H., and Reynolds, S.J. Mortality and morbidity in agriculture in the United States. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 8(3):259-276, 2002.

26. Browning, S.; Truszczynska, H.; Reed, D.; et al. Agricultural injuries among older Kentucky farmers: The Farm Family and Health Hazard Surveillance Study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 33(4):341-353, 1998.

27. Gerberich, S.G.; Robertson, L.S.; Gibson, R.W.; et al. An epidemiological study of roadway fatalities related to farm vehicles: United States, 1988 to 1993. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 38(11):1135-1140, 1996.

28. Castillo, D.; Adekoya N.; and Myers, J. Fatal work-related injuries in the agricultural production and services sectors among youth in the United States, 1992-1996. Journal of Agromedicine 6(3):27-41, 1999.

29. National Children’s Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety. Childhood Agricultural Safety Network, 2002.

30. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Injury and Poison Control and Committee on Community Health Services. Prevention of agricultural injuries among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 108(4):1016-1019, 2001.

31. Myers, J.R., and Hendricks, K. Injuries among youth on farms in the United States, 1998. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Publication Number 2001-154, 2001.

32. Schulman, M.D.; Evensen, C.T.; Runyan, C.W.; et al. Farm work is dangerous for teens: Agricultural hazards and injuries among North Carolina teens. Journal of Rural Health 13(4):295-305, 1997.

33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth agricultural work-related injuries treated in emergency departments¾United States, October 1995-September 1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 47(35):733-737, 1998.

34. National Center for Health Statistics, Health, U.S., 2002 with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD, 2002.

35. Sing, R.F.; Branas, C.C.; MacKenzie, E.J.; et al. Geographic variation in serious nonfatal firearm injuries in Pennsylvania. Journal of Trauma 43(5):825-830, 1997.

36. Nance, M.; Denysenko, L.; Durbin, D.R.; et al. The rural-urban continuum: Variability in statewide serious firearm injuries in children and adolescents. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 156:781-785, 2002.

37. Nordstrom, D.L.; Zwerling, C.; Stromquist, A.M.; et al. Rural population survey of behavioral and demographic risk factors for loaded firearms. Injury Prevention 7(2):112-116, 2001.

38. Adekoya, N. Trends in childhood drowning on U.S. farms, 1986-1997. Journal of Rural Health 19(1):11-14, 2003.

39. Rivara, F. Fatal and non-fatal farm injuries to children and adolescents in the United States, 1990-1993. Injury Prevention 3(3):190-194, 1997.

40. Howland, J.; Hingson, R.; Mangione, T.W.; et al. Why are most drowning victims men? Sex differences in aquatic skills and behaviors. American Journal of Public Health 86(1):93-96, 1996.

41. Warneke, C.L., and Cooper, S.P. Child and adolescent drownings in Harris County, Texas, 1983 through 1990. American Journal of Public Health 84(4):593-598, 1994.

42. Reeves, M., and Schafer, K. Greater risks, fewer rights: U.S. farmworkers and pesticides. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 9(1):30-39, 2003.

43. Richardson, D.; Hicks, M.; and Walker, R. Falls in rural elders: An empirical study of risk factors. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 15(3):178-182, 2002.

44. Isberner, F.; Ritzel, D.; Sarvela, P.; et al. Falls of elderly rural home health clients. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 17(2):41-51, 1998.

45. Reuters. Study shows range of injuries to infants. In New York Times. New York, NY, A14 (Column 1), June 2, 2003.

46. Quayle, K.S.; Wick, N.A.; Gnauck, K.A.; et al. Description of Missouri children who suffer burn injuries. Injury Prevention 6(4):255-258, 2000.

47. Egley, A., and Arjunan, M. Highlights of the 2000 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Fact Sheet (04), 2002.

48. Egley, A. National youth gang survey trends from 1996 to 2000. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Fact Sheet (03), 2002.

49. Murty, S. Chapter 16: No Safe Place to Hide. In: Loue, S. and Quill, B.E., eds. Handbook of Rural Health. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001, 277-293.

50. Monsey, B.; Owen, G.; Zierman, C.; et al. What works in preventing rural violence. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, 1995.

51. Mulder, P.; Shellenberger, S.; Streiegel, R.; et al. The behavioral health care needs of rural women. American Psychological Association, 2000.

52. Johnson, M., and Elliott, B.A. Domestic violence among family practice patients in midsized and rural communities. Journal of Family Practice 44(4):391-400, 1997.

53. Straus, M.A., and Smith, C. Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In: Straus, M.A. and Gelles, R.J., eds. Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1990, 341-367.

54. Glasgow, N.; Holden, L.; McLaughlin, P.; et al. Poverty among rural elders: Trends, context and directions for policy. Journal of Applied Gerontology 12(3):302-319, 1993.

55. Cubbin, C.; Pickle, L.; and Fingerhut, L. Social context and geographic patterns of homicide among U.S. black and white males. American Journal of Public Health 90(4):579-587, 2000.

56. Gunderson, P.; Donner, D.; Nashold, R.; et al. The epidemiology of suicide among farm residents or workers in five north-central states, 1980-1988. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 9:26-32, 1993.

57. Liu, T., and Waterbor, J. Declining use of firearms to commit suicide in Alabama in the 1980s. Omega 30(2):145-153, 1995.

58. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Homicide and suicide among Native Americans 1979-1992. Violence Surveillance Summary Series No. 2. 1998.

59. Snyder, H.N., and Sickmund, M. Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report. National Center for Juvenile Justice: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.

60. Kelley, B.; Huizinga, D.; Thornberry, T.P.; et al. Epidemiology of serious violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 1997, June 1997.

61. Gausche, M.; Seidel, J.S.; Henderson, D.P.; et al. Violent death in the pediatric age group: Rural and urban differences. Pediatric Emergency Care 5(1):64-67, 1989.

62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Death: Leading Causes for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports 50(16), 2002.

63. Arias, E., and Smith, B.L. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Reports. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, 2003.

64. Whooley, M.; Kip, K.E.; Cauley, J.A.; et al. Depression, falls, and risk of fracture in older women. Archives of Internal Medicine 159:484-490, 1999.

65. Rifai, N.; Cohen, G.; Wolf, M.; et al. Incidence of lead poisoning in young children from inner-city, suburban, and rural communities. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 15(2):71-74, 1993.

66. Polivka, B. Rural residents’ knowledge of lead poisoning prevention. Journal of Community Health 24(5):393-408, 1999.

67. Raush, T.; Sanddal, N.D.; Sanddal, T.L.; et al. Changing epidemiology of injury-related pediatric mortality in a rural state: Implications for injury control. Pediatric Emergency Care 14(6):388-392, 1998.

68. Svenson, J.; Spurlock, C.; and Nypaver, M. Pediatric firearm-related fatalities. Not just an urban problem. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 150(6):583-587, 1996.

69. Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence, Model Domestic Policy for Counties. State of New York, 1998.

70. Curcio, C. The Passaic County study of AFDC recipients in a welfare to work program. Passaic County Board of Social Services: Passaic County, New Jersey, 1997.

71. Wingood, G.M.; DiClemente, R.J.; and Raj, A. Adverse consequences of intimate partner abuse among women in non-urban domestic violence shelters. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 19(4):270-275, 2000.

72. Danielson, K.; Moffit, T.; Casp, A.; et al. Comorbidity between abuse of an adult and DSM-III-R mental disorders: Evidence from an epidemiological study. American Journal of Psychiatry 155(1):131-133, 1998.

73. Stark, E., and Flitcraft, A. Killing the beast within: Woman battering and female suicidality. International Journal of Health Sciences 25(1):131-133, 1995.

74. Gelles, R., and Harrop, J. Violence, battering, and psychological distress among women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 4(1):400-420, 1989.

75. Kendler, K. Childhood sexual abuse and adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in women: An epidemiological and co-twin control analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry 57(10):953-959, 2000.

76. Romans, S.; Poore, M.; and Martin, J. The perpetrators of domestic violence. Medical Journal of America 173:484-488, 2000.

77. Edelson, J. The overlap between child maltreatment and women battering. Violence against Women 5(2):134-154, 1999.

78. Spaccarelli, S.; Coatsworth J.; and Bowden, B. Exposure to serious family violence among incarcerated boys: Its association with violent offending and potential mediating variables. Violence and Victims 10:63-182, 1995.

79. Gortner, E.; Gollan, J.; and Jacobson, N. Psychological aspects of perpetrators of domestic violence and their relationships with the victims. Psychiatry Clinics of North America 20:337-352, 1997.

80. Muelleman, R.L.; Walker, R.A.; and Edney, J.A. Motor vehicle deaths: A rural epidemic. Journal of Trauma 35(5):717-719, 1993.

81. Wylie, M., and Kimball, R. Rural motor vehicle crashes: Can we prevent them? Journal of Emergency Nursing 123:542-544.

82. Campbell, P. Domestic violence is a rural health issue. Rural Health News 5(2):1, 1999.

83. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Injury and Poison Control. The hospital record of the injured child and the need for external cause-of-injury codes. Pediatrics 103(2):524-526, 1999.

84. Gadomski, A.M.; Tripp, M.; Wolf, D.A.; et al. Impact of rural domestic violence prevention campaign. Journal of Rural Health 17(3):266-277, 2001.

85. World Health Organization, Chapter 5: Abuse of the Elderly, in World Report on Violence and Health. 2002, World Health Organization: Geneva: Switzerland, 125-145.

86. Swagerty, D.; Takahashi, P.; and Evans, J. Elder mistreatment. American Family Physician 59(10):2804-2808, 1999.

87. Butler, R. Warning signs of elder abuse. Geriatrics 54(Mar):3-4, 1999.

88. Levine, J. Elder neglect and abuse: A primer for primary care physicians. Geriatrics 58(10):37-44, 2003.

89. Office of Technology Assessment. Defining rural areas: Impact on health care policy research. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, GPO Stock Number 052-003-01156-5, 1989.

 

Chapter Suggested Citation

 

Castillo, G. and Alexander, J. (2004). Injury and Violence Prevention in Rural Areas. In Gamm, L. and Hutchison, L. (eds.) Rural Healthy People 2010: A companion document to Healthy People 2010. <www.srph.tamhsc.edu/centers/rhp2010> College Station, TX: The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, School of Rural Public Health, Southwest Rural Health Research Center.