EDUCATIONAL AND COMMUNITY-BASED
PROGRAMS IN RURAL AREAS
by Larry Gamm, Graciela Castillo, and Lisa
Williams
SCOPE OF PROBLEM
· Educational and community-based programs tied for
sixth place with other focus areas as a top rural health priority area.1
· School, worksite, health facility, and community-based
health promotion, prevention and intervention programs reach large segments of
the population; however, these programs may be less prevalent in rural than
urban settings.
· According to a 1994 report, only 28 percent of school districts
meet the recommended standard of one school nurse per 750 students. School
nurses in rural areas are often responsible for schools that are many miles
apart.2
· Smaller employers—the mainstay of rural economies—are
less likely than larger employers to offer health promotion and disease
prevention programs.3-5
· Rural areas may lack the readiness, resources, and
technical expertise necessary to develop successful and sustainable educational
and community-based programs.5-13
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Healthy People 2010
(HP2010) goal for the Educational and Community-Based Programs focus area is to increase the quality, availability, and
effectiveness of community and education-based programs designed to prevent
disease and improve health and quality of life.14 Settings such as the school, worksite, health care
facility, and community are an integral part of this goal; each setting
provides access to select populations through existing organizational and
social structures.15 Programs combining any or all four settings can have
a greater impact than those utilizing one setting alone. This reduces the time
and resources necessary for program development and maximizes the impact by
reaching large populations repeatedly.15
The following Healthy People
2010 objectives are addressed:
School
Setting
· 7.2. School health education
· 7.4. School nurse-to-student ratio
Worksite
Setting
· 7.5. Worksite health promotion programs
· 7.6. Participation in employer-sponsored health
promotion activities
Health Care
Setting
· 7.7. Patient and family education
· 7.9. Health care organization sponsorship of community
health promotion activities
Community
Setting and Select Populations
· 7.10. Community health promotion programs
· 7.11. Culturally appropriate and linguistically
competent health promotion programs
· 7.12. Older adult participation in community health
promotion activities
Based on a survey of state
and local rural health leaders, the Educational and Community-Based Programs focus
area was virtually tied for sixth place with four other areas as a top rural
health priority area.1
This overview differs from most
others in Rural Healthy People 2010 since it does not focus upon specific
health conditions or provider groups. Instead, the focus is on the health
education and prevention strategies used in different settings and the rural
issues—disparities, barriers, and challenges—encountered as well as evaluation,
sustainability, and feasible solutions/interventions in rural areas.
PREVALENCE
The issues and disparities facing rural
School-based Setting
A rural school is often the
most prominent institution and one of the largest local employers in the area. School-based
programs can influence students, teachers, and parents.16, 17 Approximately 20 percent of all students in public
elementary and secondary schools in the United States reside in rural areas.18 Children living in rural areas,
especially minority children and adolescents, are less likely to be insured
than urban children.19 For these and other school children, school health
education programs, school nurses, and school-based health centers may be
vitally important to their health.
Health promotion programs for
children are effective and may impact child health beyond childhood. For
example, cardiovascular disease risks and eating behaviors established in
childhood often carry into adulthood.20-24 School-based approaches can improve health habits
while reducing behavior-related risk factors.25-27 Additionally, studies of school-based tobacco and
substance abuse program interventions have been found to be effective.26, 28 Such interventions have been found to be nearly equal
in effectiveness across rural, suburban, and urban schools.26
School-based health centers
(SBHCs) may provide comprehensive physical and mental health services to
students.29 Of an estimated 1,400 school-based health centers across
the U.S. in 2002, 28 percent are located in rural areas in contrast to 61
percent in urban and 12 percent in suburban areas. A study of West Virginia
centers found higher enrollment rates in rural SBHCs than in urban schools—86
percent and 46 percent, respectively.30
Rural school nurses play a
significant role in the health-related activities of schools.31 They provide services such as health education,
screenings and assessments, and medications. In addition, more than 90 percent
of school nurses monitor students with chronic conditions such as diabetes or
asthma.32 However, a 1994 report found only 28 percent of
school districts meet the recommended standard of one school nurse per 750
students. Among schools with an average of 190 students, over 40 percent of
schools responding to the survey did not have a school nurse.7
A school nurse shortage may
reduce both the amount and quality of health promotion and prevention
activities. A 2003 Washington state report noted rural school districts have
limited or no access to school nurses and psychologists.33 To make matters worse, school nurses in rural areas
are often responsible for schools that are many miles apart.32 This shortage may force other school staff members, such as secretaries,
to assume school nurse functions in some rural schools. A Montana survey of
school secretaries found nearly three-quarters of respondents provided care for
students’ injuries or illnesses on a weekly basis, while 70 percent of
respondents passed out prescription medication on a weekly basis.7
Worksite Settings
Worksite health programs vary
from health education, services and benefits, and counseling programs to
policies that promote safe working conditions.34, 35 These programs have been found to reduce medical care
costs and absenteeism.36, 37 Most worksite studies of health promotion activities,
however, focus on large businesses,5, 36 while rural economies are relatively more reliant on
small businesses.5
According to 2002 survey of
Several reasons are
frequently cited for the few health promotion programs in small businesses. These
include: (1) lack of a knowledgeable staff member able to design and organize a
health program; (2) financial inability to offer health insurance and promotion
and preventive programs; and, (3) burden of health and safety regulations that
may limit resources for those programs not required by law.5
Health Care Facility Settings
Health care facilities are
frequent settings for health promotion, prevention, and treatment programs. Health
providers are often trusted and respected, and patients are usually receptive
to health information they provide.15 In physician offices, prevention education for
patients is viewed as part of the physician’s role, and evaluations of the
effectiveness of these efforts are published.38
Several rural community
health centers have participated in the U.S. Bureau of Primary Health Care-sponsored
collaboratives that have focused on secondary and tertiary prevention of
chronic illnesses since 1998. Although patients relying on such centers are
more likely to be poor and uninsured or on Medicaid, there is evidence rural
health center patients are significantly more likely than people in the general
rural population to receive preventive services and experience decreased rates
of low birth weight, especially among African Americans.39, 40
Hospitals have a history of
health promotion and disease prevention activities in the community. A survey
of Iowa hospitals found over 98 percent of rural hospitals offered health
promotion services such as cancer screenings, safety and protection programs,
nutrition programs, and prenatal/maternal health services.41 Rural hospitals frequently collaborate with providers
and community organizations such as churches, civic clubs, and employers to
pool resources to fund and staff programs and services for larger populations. In
general, hospital collaboration with community organizations can be associated
with desires to improve the community health and/or any of several threats—external
regulation, loss of tax exempt status for nonprofit hospitals, or increased
market competition.8, 42
Community Settings
Community-based programs seek
to improve a community’s health through comprehensive approaches combining
education, prevention, screening, and treatment.43 Such approaches can effectively reach special
populations who are otherwise difficult to reach—rural, undereducated,
economically disadvantaged, or minority groups.26
A community health governance
model developed by a workgroup of nine partnerships in Turning Point, a foundation-funded initiative, emphasizes the
importance of collaborations to empower individuals within communities, to
bridge social ties in the community, and to create and leverage synergy.12 Community-based programs require a diverse group of
members representing a cross-section of social and economic sectors of the
community. Community involvement is necessary at all stages—assessing needs,
identifying resources, and implementing and governing the program. This ensures
that the multiple factors affecting the health of a population are considered
and incorporated into interventions.44-47
BARRIERS
Effective Mobilization
It is frequently a challenge to mobilize schools, worksites, health facilities, and communities in rural areas. Under-funded schools may be unable to support a school nurse, much less underwrite a school health center. Rural hospitals may not be encouraged by staff or board members to engage in health promotion or disease prevention strategies.8 Even where interest is present, such health care facilities often face time or financial constraints.